News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hyperloop by joshAg on Monday August 12, 2013 @07:49PM (#6203053)
In the US, rail is optimized for freight, not people.
Re:Hyperloop by krrrh on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @01:32AM (#6204166)
I don't know why the parent got downcoted. US rail freight is the envy of the world. You didn't get the European passenger rail experience without some trade offs. Here's a briefing on the subject from the Economist.

http://www.economist.com/node/16636101

Re:Hyperloop by robryan on Monday August 12, 2013 @08:11PM (#6203152)
Australia is the same, here passenger rail between major cities is mostly something old person take as a scenic route. Often it is actually more expensive than flying.
Re:Hyperloop by jarek on Monday August 12, 2013 @11:50PM (#6203899)
A logical outcome of the combination of private companies owning the railways and the government's willingness to build a lot of road capacity for passenger use.
Re:Hyperloop by hef19898 on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @10:56AM (#6206091)
Considering that most rivers go from the north to the south and the big distances (compared to, say, Japan or Europe), that's logic. Also explains the role of air travel.
Re:Hyperloop by jfb on Monday August 12, 2013 @07:58PM (#6203101)
Inasmuch as it's optimized at all.
Re:Hyperloop by syncsynchalt on Monday August 12, 2013 @08:16PM (#6203173)
We really do have arguably the best freight rail system in the world. http://business.time.com/2012/07/09/us-freight-railroads/
Re:Hyperloop by throwaway_yy2Di on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @01:39AM (#6204180)
"America's freight railways are... universally recognised in the industry as the best in the world":

http://www.economist.com/node/16636101