News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by dewitt on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:18PM (#6188597)
"And thus spoke someone who has never built a REST API"

Here are Brett's projects: http://www.onebigfluke.com/

Maybe you've heard of some of them? PubSubHubbub, Google App Engine, Camlistore, Google Consumer Surveys.

Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by manarth on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:28PM (#6188653)
I'm sorry, I must have missed the <hyperbole> tags.

Yes, the comment is embellished, but the only place where GET and POST are the only verbs is in a basic web browser. Step outside that world, and the other verbs are in use every day…and intermediary devices - with no knowledge of the business logic of the target server - accommodate those verbs, with proper behavior for the most part. Moving those to the URL means that intermediaries cannot disambiguate the intent.

Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by jamesaguilar on Friday August 09, 2013 @05:30PM (#6188660)
It wasn't really hyperbole, it was just wrong.
Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by manarth on Friday August 09, 2013 @07:43PM (#6189310)
Um, I suggest you look up the definition of the word "Hyperbole". I understand that as a Googler, you wish to defend a fellow Googler, but please differentiate between the arguments of "I disagree with the premise of your argument" and "You're wrong". As a Googler, I'd hope you are reasonably technically literate, and therefore could come up with a rather more refined response than "You're just wrong".
Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by chc on Friday August 09, 2013 @08:09PM (#6189412)
Hyperbole means exaggerating something, usually for emphasis or humor. Even taking your comment as hyperbole, the intended, non-exaggerated meaning still appears to be "this person has insufficient experience to speak on this subject." But the person in question is actually very experienced in this area. Given that, I don't think we can blame James if he didn't understand — it's hard to see what the actual meaning behind the statement could have been.
Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by jamesaguilar on Saturday August 10, 2013 @01:59AM (#6190219)
Yeah, I know what hyperbole means. The problem is your comment was not even in the correct direction. Hyperbole is overstating a truth, not strongly stating something false.

And, this guy is a Googler? Who knew? You know your argument is weak when your best responses are "look it up in a dictionary," and "you work for the same company hur hur."

Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by manarth on Saturday August 10, 2013 @02:46AM (#6190282)
My point about hyperbole was that it's "an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally". To be fair, I hadn't come across Brett's work before…but anyone writing with degree of detail about HTTP headers, referencing SPACEJUMP and PubSubHubbub has probably used curl -I and may well have worked with a REST API. My point is that the argument - we only use GET and POST - only holds water if we're talking about browsers. although I do see how people could interpret the comment differently, and we all know duty calls: http://xkcd.com/386
Re:Let's remove verbs from HTTP 2.0 by thomasz on Saturday August 10, 2013 @12:25AM (#6190050)
"The guy build appengine" isn't a convincing argument either. This is a personal blog, not a peer reviewed journal. Sometimes even distinguished people throw out 270 words without thinking too much about it.