Re:Russian Man Changes Small Print in Credit Card Agreement,...
by Fuxy on Thursday August 08, 2013 @10:38AM
(#6179157)
He couldn't afford to pay the credit card bills after 2 years what makes you think this guy has a lot of electronics in his house.
I would wager he probably has 1 crappy old computer a printer and a smartphone (just my guess as an eastern European).
He could care less if all that crap gets locked off.
As far as I can tell even that fact that he kept his end of the contract to the best of his abilities for 2 years can be used as proof that he isn't fraudster.
A fraudster would have done that a lot sooner.
Re:Russian Man Changes Small Print in Credit Card Agreement,...
by jarrett on Thursday August 08, 2013 @03:07PM
(#6181044)
If we assume that at least some unethical prosecutors exist (which seems verifiable) then this risk exists any time you do something to annoy someone who has influence over said unethical prosecutors. So then it's no longer a question of what the law is, but of pure, cynical politics. When you get into that realm, all bets are off.
The problem is that fraud charge may be hard to prove, but may be much easier to initiate. And criminal investigation, even not resulting yet in a charge, may be rather annoying matter. For example, they could get (given a friendly judge) an order to seize all your computer equipment to look for signs of fraudulent activity. And keep "looking" for years, while you can't use them. And so on. If they arrange a cooperation of a friendly prosecutor, they can cost you lots of money while never getting to the court. Since they are paid by the taxpayers and you're not, you lose.