Re:Things Wolfram Alpha Does Better (And Vastly Different) T...
by abecedarius on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @05:58PM
(#617706)
The volume in question was actually that of the classical "sphere of fixed stars" -- I input it initially as something like "volume of the solar system" and had a brief impulse to accept its rephrasing as "planets volume", especially when I couldn't drill down further into its explanation. It's pretty natural to just assume it knows what you meant.
Re:Things Wolfram Alpha Does Better (And Vastly Different) T...
by las3rjock on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @02:15PM
(#617287)
That query calculates "median planet volume / volume of a small grain of sand", as mentioned by the grandparent poster. I believe it is still an open question how to get Wolfram|Alpha to calculate "total planet volume / volume of a small grain of sand".
Re:Things Wolfram Alpha Does Better (And Vastly Different) T...
by PhazeDK on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @03:05PM
(#617398)
"solar system volume / volume of grain of sand" works.
http://www54.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solar+system+volume+/...
or "planets volume / volume of grain of sand"
Re:Things Wolfram Alpha Does Better (And Vastly Different) T...
by dangoldin on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @02:36PM
(#617338)
Ah my mistake.
I tried "9 * average (planet volume) / average(volume of a grain of sand)" now but that's not working either.
Re:Things Wolfram Alpha Does Better (And Vastly Different) T...
by jodrellblank on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @02:38PM
(#617342)
"total planetary volume / volume of a grain of sand" gives an answer in "mile cubed shares per picoliter".
Yowch.
volume of planets / volume of a grain of sand gets the desired result