Re:Everybody's Lying to You
by pchristensen on Tuesday May 19, 2009 @09:21AM
(#616711)
There are four numbers (1950, 2000, one-half, 1%) between annual and per year. Even though it's redundant, it makes it easier to read. A big part of Motley Fool's appeal is the accessibility of their writing and explanation.
What's the intent here? Why not say "0.5% annually"? And why do people say "one-half"? Is this typical of economics journalism?
[edit] The whole sentence seems redundant anyway.
the average annual investment return from 1950-2000 was less than one-half of 1% per year
"annual investment return" implies "per year" and vice versa.