News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OS X emulation layer for Linux by mattrepl on Monday August 05, 2013 @09:42AM (#6160004)
Using Qt as a Cocoa stand-in sounds complicated. Since Darling already uses its own loader and syscall hooking to provide compatibility for the program, why not do the same for a framework like Cocoa?
Re:OS X emulation layer for Linux by zw on Monday August 05, 2013 @10:23AM (#6160239)
Same type of deal as in Wine, copyright-type stuff.
Re:OS X emulation layer for Linux by nikcub on Monday August 05, 2013 @11:14AM (#6160564)
there is hope that the decision in Oracle vs Google[0] on API's not being copyrightable might change that

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_v._Google

Re:OS X emulation layer for Linux by mattrepl on Monday August 05, 2013 @11:40AM (#6160749)
I think zw meant that the Cocoa binaries can't be distributed with Darling. That's not a major problem for users that have a copy of OS X. Darling can allow users to supply their own.

The potential issue you refer to would also prevent implementing the Cocoa API with Qt.