News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Xerox scanners and photocopiers randomly alter numbers in... by michaelt on Sunday August 04, 2013 @06:34PM (#6157369)
I think we can all agree that e-mails should have finite size - it's not a very good protocol for transferring multi-gigabyte files, for sure! Where we would disagree is where that limit should be drawn.

I've seen systems in this day and age that fail in the face of e-mails as small as 5 megabytes (e.g. Yahoo Popgate) which IMHO is far too low - but evidently some sysadmins disagree with me!

Re:Xerox scanners and photocopiers randomly alter numbers in... by PeterisP on Monday August 05, 2013 @10:20AM (#6160222)
Email size is a technical issue that shouldn't be limiting (or even visible) to the end user. If an end user wants to send a multigigabyte file to another user's email address - why not? The email client could launch a background upload process and email a link to get that file by, say, bittorrent... Some protocol extensions and software support would be needed, but that can be done and, as users need it, probabpy should be done.
Re:Xerox scanners and photocopiers randomly alter numbers in... by wiml on Monday August 05, 2013 @11:14PM (#6164608)
Oh, the protocols are already in place; consider RFC2017.

Sending a link to something (even wrapped in a nice ui and container) has pretty different semantics from actually sending the something, though.

Re:Xerox scanners and photocopiers randomly alter numbers in... by ams6110 on Sunday August 04, 2013 @11:34PM (#6158283)
Opinions run the gamut. I'm firmly in the "email should be plain text" camp but realized that battle was lost long ago.