Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by yread on Friday August 02, 2013 @09:11AM
(#6146675)
If plastics absorb PCBs and pesticides, couldn't we use big (so they can't be swallowed), porous (to increase the surface) pieces of plastic to clean the water?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by eksith on Friday August 02, 2013 @11:05AM
(#6147342)
I think maybe this idea has floated around (no pun intended). There's a nice demo for teachers here : http://www.cmu.edu/gelfand/k12-teachers/polymers/polymer-and...
Ironically the plastic was polypropylene there too.
Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by astrodust on Friday August 02, 2013 @12:49PM
(#6148072)
Don't use one toxin to clean up another.
Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by Houshalter on Friday August 02, 2013 @01:49PM
(#6148475)
Why not? The things can be removed from the water, and even if they weren't, there could still be a net benefit in having one toxin over another.
Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by astrodust on Friday August 02, 2013 @02:43PM
(#6148807)
History is filled with examples of well-intentioned solutions like this going horribly awry.
Talk to an Australian about cane toads, for example. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cane_toads_in_Australia).
Re:Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic
by Houshalter on Friday August 02, 2013 @06:13PM
(#6150003)
Maybe so, however that is a fully general counterargument that applies to any attempt to solve any problem ever.