Re:Google's AdBlockPlus deal will save them nearly $1bn per ...
by joosters on Friday August 02, 2013 @09:15AM
(#6146686)
Good point about the rate varying a lot based on the audience - I imagine that tech sites have it worst for blocking rates.
I wonder how the rates vary for tablet/mobile viewing? I'd guess fewer users manage to block ads on these devices?
Re:Google's AdBlockPlus deal will save them nearly $1bn per ...
by seanblanchfield on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:28AM
(#6147065)
Oh, and blocking rates on mobile/tablet is very low, probably consisting of ISP-level adblocking. That will shortly change though - the adblock community is hard at work creating mobile versions.
Re:Google's AdBlockPlus deal will save them nearly $1bn per ...
by seanblanchfield on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:25AM
(#6147045)
The rate is actually highest on gaming-related sites. I guess that audience is usually sufficiently technical, and is also habitually bombarded with aggressive advertising.
Re:Google's AdBlockPlus deal will save them nearly $1bn per ...
by lynchdt on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:17AM
(#6146994)
Have any of your customers used the metrics they gleaned to size up an ad-blocker white-listing offer themselves?
Re:Google's AdBlockPlus deal will save them nearly $1bn per ...
by seanblanchfield on Friday August 02, 2013 @10:25AM
(#6147041)
Not so far as we are aware. Not many sites have gone down the whitelisting route, for the kind of reasons discussed in the post above.
That said, lots of our customers are discovering just how badly they are affected. Some sites have more than 64% of their visitors blocking their ads, and are facing extinction.
A fair estimate of a minimum value is the block rate on sites that are non-techie, e.g., lifestyle (12% blockrate) and news (16% blockrate).
We'll be doing another post soon revealing all these numbers and our methodology in collecting them in detail.