Google ‘pressure cooker,’ get a police visit? Maybe not.

Re:Google ‘pressure cooker,’ get a police visit? Maybe not. by mladenkovacevic on Thursday August 01, 2013 @05:47PM (#6143788)

Reasonably good job on taking my sarcastic remark and applying it to this situation where it really has no business being applied to. No really, kudos.

Fact 1) Woman claims she was visited by some type of joint task terrorist police force

Fact 2) She claims that they asked her husband about pressure cookers and whether they knew how to make a bomb with it

Fact 3) She claims to have searched for pressure cookers on Google earlier

Let's just try and verify if those facts are indeed true and/or related before hand-waving the whole thing off as a "Maybe not!" because there is no "hard evidence".. okay?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google ‘pressure cooker,’ get a police visit? Maybe not. by untog on Thursday August 01, 2013 @06:12PM (#6143941)

I'm not sure in what sense that was supposed to be sarcasm. Hyperbole, perhaps. In any case, I took it and applied a rule that applies equally in non-sarcastic/hyperbolic situations.

Anyway. You've just stated that we have three entirely unverified facts. How is "maybe, maybe not" the incorrect response to that?

[ Parent | on HN ]