News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snowden granted 1-year asylum in Russia, leaves airport by voodoo123 on Thursday August 01, 2013 @12:31PM (#6141446)
No, because there would be no proof that the false flag terrorism was having an effect, unlike the case where terrorism led to an obvious change in policy, as was the case in Ireland).

I agree totally that policy changes should be considered on their own merits. Therefore we should defend ourselves against terrorist attacks without regard for their stated goals.

Re:Snowden granted 1-year asylum in Russia, leaves airport by dragonwriter on Thursday August 01, 2013 @12:40PM (#6141528)
> No, because there would be no proof that the false flag terrorism was having an effect

There are certainly ways of assessing why particularly policies are and are not chosen. The impact of "Can't do what terrorists want, so we must vote no" is no more difficult to assess than "Must do what terrorists want, so we must vote yes".

Re:Snowden granted 1-year asylum in Russia, leaves airport by voodoo123 on Thursday August 01, 2013 @01:24PM (#6141892)
I never said anything about voting or not based on terrorist actions.

mikeash said it was ok not to defend so hard against terrorism because the outcome was good. I was refuting that.