News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Psychotherapy via Internet found as good as or better tha... by aridiculous on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @10:31AM (#6133920)
"Patients treated online had to perform one predetermined written task per therapy unit – such as querying their own negative self-image."

Smells like bad experimental design. Shouldn't the face-to-face subjects also be completing written tasks in session as a control? There are entire schools of psychotherapy that require in-session activities.

If not, then they should compare standard talk face-to-face therapy with online CBT "chat."

As an addendum: I think social sciences are categorically separate from harder sciences (good social scientists understand this) and attempts at laboratory/population experiments are typically laughable. They're usually just done because that's what the people and organizations that fund the departments want.

Re:Psychotherapy via Internet found as good as or better tha... by thelamest on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @12:48PM (#6135078)
I get the sentiment, but attempts at experiments are what makes science a science. Psychology actually drove a lot of progress in statistics, because of the fuzzy character of data.
Re:Psychotherapy via Internet found as good as or better tha... by vacri on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @07:18PM (#6137496)
They're usually just done because that's what the people and organizations that fund the departments want

Is that not exactly the same for the 'hard sciences'?