News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Altman says Loopt to be profitable in 2009 by zimbabwe on Sunday May 17, 2009 @03:33AM (#613147)
Why can't it be both? Youth and inexperience may not necessarily mean attempting the impossible, like menloparkbum suggested, but certainly being youthful means having a better grasp on what's going on. So it's right to attribute part of his success to youth: he made a product that appeals to the youthful market.

Similarly, youth is a good reason to think that Foursquare could be a threat. The people making Foursquare have already created a successful product in this market. They spent a few years working for a powerful company that didn't understand their ideas. So they're the people who hit the market before Sam did, and they're returning with a more refined concept than they had before. The fact that they're youthful and determined is why I'm watching them and ignoring attempts like Google Latitude, which practically scream sterile.

Re:Altman says Loopt to be profitable in 2009 by axod on Sunday May 17, 2009 @04:47AM (#613188)
There have been several startups doing the same sort of thing, all failing. I'm still not convinced people want this (Location aware social networking mobile thingy). It's a shame you can't get traffic figures so easily for mobile apps - without user/revenue numbers it's all speculation as to how successful or otherwise loopt is.

IPO seems like crazy talk to me.

Re:Altman says Loopt to be profitable in 2009 by zimbabwe on Sunday May 17, 2009 @04:53AM (#613197)
I don't use my cell for networking. I don't like that constant connectivity. But within that market, I would suggest that the Dodgeball team is a force to be reckoned with.

Perhaps I'm biased because Loopt is ugly as sin, and Foursquare is slightly better.