News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by gamblor956 on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @12:31PM (#6128083)
Weev didn't just download the data, he released it without first telling AT&T about the flaw. If he had simply told AT&T the data was available, without deliberately violating the privacy of hundreds of thousands of people, he wouldn't be in a minimum security federal penitentiary right now.

Weev is not one of the good guys. He acted deliberately, and that makes all the difference.

Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by sp332 on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @12:53PM (#6128249)
Weev made the info easier to get, and I'm not saying he should have done it, but the info was already available publicly on the internet. This should have been a civil case where AT&T could get damages or something. Instead they outlawed "using a script to download data that someone accidentally posted to the web", which is insane.
Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by lawnchair_larry on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @03:20PM (#6129348)
Nope, he didn't release it. He showed it to a journalist to substantiate his claim, and then deleted it.
Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by obstacle1 on Tuesday July 30, 2013 @10:34PM (#6131561)
If the information was already public-facing, was it not already 'released'?
Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by sigzero on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @07:47AM (#6133002)
Not in the general usage of that word, no.
Re:Kathy Sierra: Your app makes me fat by obstacle1 on Wednesday July 31, 2013 @06:41PM (#6137304)
I'm not clear on what you mean. General usage of the word "release" necessitates prior confinement. Dumping a bunch of data on an open web server is not confining said data, it is making it public. Even if the data was previously confined -- by, say, company policy or copyright or whatever -- as soon as it is uploaded to the public-facing web server without protections it is released from confinement.