Re:Bootstrap 3
by moogleii on Monday July 29, 2013 @10:00AM
(#6121118)
Maybe Foundation would suit you better. I heard it's a bit more lightweight than BS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I checked it out for that reason. Then I found a number of social images and began wondering why a lightweight CSS framework needed images for facebook, twitter, etc...
Re:Bootstrap 3
by jaredmcateer on Monday July 29, 2013 @10:10AM
(#6121183)
You mean the Social Icons in the Add-ons section? You don't need to include those, in fact, I believe they are opt-in, not opt-out.
Just checked and you are correct.
Re:Bootstrap 3
by thatswrong0 on Monday July 29, 2013 @03:49PM
(#6123429)
If you want something lightweight, I wouldn't go for Foundation either. Even after stripping out the unnecessary stuff, I found it overly obnoxious to style.
I ended up with the Skeleton framework after struggling with both Bootstrap and Foundation for a few days. It was a much better decision. I've also been eyeing Bourbon Neat lately as well.