News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The biggest thing nature did to fight climate change is n... by mayanksinghal on Saturday July 27, 2013 @07:00AM (#6112489)
Well, if by few hundred years you mean at least ~2.2 millenia then yes, because Buddhism's dont-take-life preaching is at least that old.

And since when did the ethics and normalities of past become the standards by which our present should be governed? If animal slaughter is alright because it was okay a few hundred years ago then slavery, child marriage and hundred other nonsensical stuff should be alright as well. What we do now should be determined by how our society feels now and how it wants to invest in the future. Arguing that that our present actions should be governed by medieval ethics is lazy.

Re:The biggest thing nature did to fight climate change is n... by Dewie on Saturday July 27, 2013 @07:59AM (#6112606)
Your parent didn't talk about ethics at all, only about the supposed squeamishness that people have towards killing animals. If I am afraid of killing animals, that has nothing to do with my ethical stance on killing animals.
Re:The biggest thing nature did to fight climate change is n... by saraid216 on Saturday July 27, 2013 @07:42AM (#6112585)
Um. I didn't make a value judgement on animal slaughter. I said he picked an ineffective example.