Here's the deal: I'd buy it anyway. The value it provides (saving time) far outweighs the restrictions. The iPhone has saved me a big chunk of time already. I was stuck in a traffic jam just yesterday, and the maps enabled me to navigate the back roads and get to a different highway. That probably saved me two hours. If my time is worth $100/hr (I'd pay $100 to live an extra hour) then the phone half paid for itself in one night. It saves time in other ways with pocket internet and pocket email. So if you don't like the restrictions, then there's a solution: don't buy it. :)
- Posted using an iPhone.
The author should have said that if you care about your rights, you shouldn't buy a cell phone--but that if you need one, and you want the best smartphone, you should get an iPhone. You get screwed on "rights", but at least you don't get screwed on usability too.
fwiw, I think it may be less only where a phone is bundled with a network. In India (where I live) you get the phone from a cell phone vendor and the SIM card from a network. You plug the SIM card int your phone and you have a working phone. Some networks have tried to sell phones that work with only a particular network but most people buy phones that works with any network and many people routinely switch networks when someone comes out with a cheaper plan. There are even phones that allow two SIM cards to be plugged in at the same time, allowing you to switch networks at the press of a button.
Cell Phone vendors compete to bring out more attractive phones and the networks compete to bring out better plans. The customer wins.
I pay about 20 $ monthly for a fantastic plan and have no complaints. I can change my phone or network independently.
I won't.
I can understand Apple not wanting people to unlock it, but I can't understand the hostility toward third-party applications. It seems like more people developing for their platform can only benefit Apple.