Re:Passive Income Hacker vs Startup Guy
by liljimmytables on Friday July 26, 2013 @11:28AM
(#6108720)
sorry to be the guy that gets picky about words, but i think you mean contention rather than paradox
Whoops -- yep, you're right! (In my defense, it's very early and I'm very bad at words.)
Re:Passive Income Hacker vs Startup Guy
by yaddayadda on Friday July 26, 2013 @02:14PM
(#6109605)
I actually think "paradox" is a perfectly acceptable word in the context used. The common usage meaning - contradiction - is particularly apropos.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox
edit: fixed nasty typo
Re:Passive Income Hacker vs Startup Guy
by foobarbazqux on Friday July 26, 2013 @03:01PM
(#6109863)
But also the "paradox" in this situation is that it's perfectly doable to meet the contradictory needs of value for customers and profit for investors at once. Many such dilemmas have paradoxical both/and solutions.
I'd say "conflict" is better term than contradiction or paradox, since we're talking interests and desires rather than logical propositions.
Re:Passive Income Hacker vs Startup Guy
by lotsofcows on Friday July 26, 2013 @11:58AM
(#6108869)
Never apologise for trying to make sense out of the world.
Something that isn't touched on too much is that it's sometimes better to only have one mistress. When your customers are your investors, then your priorities and goals suddenly become a lot clearer.