Re:Google will pay for free wireless in S.F. parks
by revelation on Thursday July 25, 2013 @06:35PM
(#6105418)
5GHz comes with less range. As in life, there is no free lunch in wireless signalling.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google will pay for free wireless in S.F. parks
by jrockway on Thursday July 25, 2013 @11:23PM
(#6106382)
Don't most working large-scale WiFi installations intentionally limit range? More computers talking to one AP is cheaper, but also doesn't work at all. So the question is: how much money does one want to spend on access points (and their locations)? If the answer is a lot, 5GHz makes a lot of sense.
(Also, how much does open air attenuate 5GHz signals, anyway?)
Edit: Interesting reading: http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/projects/wireless/pwr.html