News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by sarreph on Thursday July 25, 2013 @03:56PM (#6104580)
Was most of this done by SQL injection?
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by ripter on Thursday July 25, 2013 @04:08PM (#6104641)
Looks like they used SQL injection to get passwords and then used those passwords to access the servers.
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by rodolphoarruda on Thursday July 25, 2013 @04:16PM (#6104683)
Yeah, and that's from the application layer down to the DB layer. I wonder how they were able to pass through the other layers of the stack. I heck of a work, no wonder they'd spent "months" on it.
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by sarreph on Thursday July 25, 2013 @04:21PM (#6104716)
...crazy.
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by acv on Thursday July 25, 2013 @05:21PM (#6105083)
The article says that they used the injection to get hashed login credentials. Did they then use a rainbow table to reverse the hashing?
Re:“NASDAQ is owned.” Five men charged in largest financial ... by meowface on Thursday July 25, 2013 @08:09PM (#6105816)
There are a wide myriad of ways that plaintext can be derived from password hashes. Rainbow tables are an option if they're not salted; otherwise the attackers likely had access to fairly significant computing power (considering the amount of money they were raking in) to perform typical dictionary + bruteforce attacks on them.