News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:At the elite colleges - dim white kids by robg on Saturday September 29, 2007 @08:21AM (#61034)
Actually a good chunk of their operating budgets comes from government grants. And a requirement of tenure is ability to the get said grants. That's the cudgel the government holds - follow our regulations or get government funds cut (see stem cell research). Meanwhile, don't you think it's a tad weird that you could be considered non-profit and carry a $35 billion "endowment"? Or earn a few million in salary (as some football coaches do) and work for a "non-profit"?

And I don't think anyone would naively argue against all nepotism. But would you have guessed that twice as many non-qualified students get in based on their family than on their race? The popular debate has made the latter seem much more prevalent, as if minorities were solely responsible for squeezing out qualified whites.

Re:At the elite colleges - dim white kids by robg on Saturday September 29, 2007 @10:43AM (#61055)
"The larger question on the senators' minds was whether private colleges and universities are abusing the public trust. After all, they pay no taxes on tuition revenue or on the income from their endowments, of which Harvard boasts the largest -- $35 billion, which has lately been earning around $5 billion a year. In order to keep their tax-exempt status, other nonprofit institutions (charitable foundations, for example) are required to give away a hefty percentage of their money. Hospitals are required to care for indigent patients. But what, exactly, are colleges doing to justify their public subsidies?"

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/magazine/30wwln-lede-t.htm...