News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Practical Typography by tptacek on Wednesday July 24, 2013 @09:22AM (#6096003)
This is, I think, the real reason: if you're going to make a living selling fonts, you're going to be selling them to agencies and publications. There aren't enough of those to make a living if your fonts cost $5 a piece. There are a lot of things priced this way.

Obviously, the other issue is that a publication will pay a gigantic amount of money for a typeface, but HN readers will only reluctantly spend $21. Rather than trying to bridge the gap, it makes sense to sell to the party that values your work the most. Again, this is a very common and sensible pricing dynamic.

Operators of $5/yr SAAS services take heed!

Re:Practical Typography by pron on Wednesday July 24, 2013 @09:34AM (#6096063)
In that case, they should have "blog only" licenses, or "small-website only", or "small business documents only".

People buy lots of stupid stuff. If they buy hats that their characters can wear in a computer game, they will probably buy fonts, too.

Re:Practical Typography by tptacek on Wednesday July 24, 2013 @09:37AM (#6096074)
Sure, but you're going to have to give them some time, because they're only just now figuring out how to license web fonts in such a way that they're tied to sites or pageviews instead of granting blanket permission to use the fonts for websites, magazines, and investor reports.

In the meantime, you're not where their bread is buttered yet, so the urgency isn't there.

Re:Practical Typography by krrrh on Thursday July 25, 2013 @02:05AM (#6101153)
see typekit.com for an example of blog or small-website only pricing