News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Package Signing is not the Holy Grail by lifeisstillgood on Wednesday July 24, 2013 @06:02AM (#6095259)
That's an interesting idea - there could be easily be a Python core key ring and each library / package could connect off that trust circle.

Interesting -

Re:Why Package Signing is not the Holy Grail by rlpb on Wednesday July 24, 2013 @07:08AM (#6095435)
The catch is that signing a key does not usually convey "trust", just "identity". In Debian, trust is assigned at the end of a successful application process to becoming a Debian Maintainer or Developer, and this trust is conveyed for a particular identity with presence in the official Debian keyring. So in Debian, trust is centralized.

However, it doesn't have to be exactly like this. I can imagine a decentralized system built on the same tooling. For example: you could require three certifications from existing members in the set, bootstrapped from Guido, for inclusion in the trusted keychain. (You might additionally limit the maximum degrees of separation from Guido to assist with auditability).