Re:Art prodigy poses 'ethical nightmare' for parents
by ekianjo on Sunday July 21, 2013 @10:41PM
(#6081467)
There's probably a lot coming from the fact that the kid would have exposure to two cultures in the first place. Maybe this helps the kid to be more "open" in the first place, more "curious" subsenquently, and therefore potentially more successful in the end. Who knows. I don't think it's so much about genes, honestly speaking.
It seems it's simply "hybrid vigour" - when you cross strains, you can get the both of both pools. But there's a logical dark side - you can also get the worst of both. (In nature, hybrid vigour is a net positive, because the weaker ones are selected against...) I say "logical" because I haven't actually ever observed this in reality.
Anecdotally, Elvis Presley, Keanu Reeves and Tiger Woods seem to demonstrate this with other gene pools - but I have no idea of the statistics with respect to other actors/athletes. And there are other factors, such as non-standard features being considering more striking, the parents being strong-willed, self-determined and courageous enough to go against the norm, the other being considered so attractive and valuable to be worth the hassle, etc.