News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A $45 Android tablet by derefr on Sunday July 21, 2013 @08:46PM (#6081149)
Except that, if you have both a WalMart and a CostCo in your town, you'll still make a cost-comparison, between:

    cost of set of things found at WalMart A
    + cost of a few extra things not found at WalMart B
    + travel time T
and

    cost of set of things found at CostCo A'
    + cost of a few extra things not found at CostCo B'
    + travel time T'
In other words, you might not be able to find all the same things at WalMart and CostCo, or for the same prices, but if you're in the price-range of both stores and trying to optimize your purchasing, you'll still be deciding which one to shop at.
Re:A $45 Android tablet by ars on Sunday July 21, 2013 @09:35PM (#6081295)
First that's a comparison for the shopper, not the retailer (and we are discussing the retailer here).

And second, you can only buy at Costco if you need the quantities they sell. Everything you can get at Costco you can also get at WalMart, but the reverse is not the case - it's not "a few extra thing" - Costco doesn't carry a huge amount of stuff you can get at WalMart.

So for the consumer buying at Costco is exclusively about what quantity they need. (Or if they have a lot of storage space + budget to store extra.) And then they also have to go to WalMart to fill in the rest.

Or in other words they complement each other - they are only partially competitors.