I agree. Like most other typical creationists she only knows caricatures of the scientific theories she doesn't "believe" in. A scientific theory is not something one believes in, it's something you either accept or don't accept. If you don't accept it, then you should have a good reason for doing so. And no, a lack of characters and narrative in a scientific theory is not a reason to reject it because IT ISN'T A FUCKING NOVEL.

This and many of her articles are filed under "Arts and Entertainment"