Re:Yes We Can. Ruby "require" over HTTP, That Is.
by tptacek on Tuesday May 12, 2009 @05:20PM
(#606174)
There's a difference between not following best practices and precluding yourself from doing so.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Yes We Can. Ruby "require" over HTTP, That Is.
by Vitaly on Tuesday May 12, 2009 @05:32PM
(#606194)
How exactly you are precluding yourself from doing anything by using http_require?
http_require is equivalent from the security standpoint to doing 'wget ...;..;make install' and myriad other less then secure things we do almost everyday (including on production server. how did you install sphynx last time around? did you check any signatures). http_require can be used in similar ways with same security effect. saying that http_require is somehow inherently less secure then those everyday tools is somewhat hypocritical :)