News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by anigbrowl on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @05:36PM (#6054895)
You're really assuming your conclusion here. William Binney did not go to prison at all; Thomas Drake got a month's probation. Now I'm not saying that they were free to make their revelations, or that it was easy; they went through a great deal of stress, legal expense, and obviously their public service careers are permanently over. But that's still a very long way from 'having your life completely ruined.'
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by chc on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @05:41PM (#6054932)
Not exactly. I'm assuming that Snowden doesn't believe what he did will hold up in courts. Do you really feel that is an unfair assumption?
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by anigbrowl on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @05:53PM (#6054983)
Not at all, but the courts might only impose a nominal penalty, such as the single month of probation to which they sentenced Drake. Why don't you address my point, instead of relying on the implicit assumption that facing the music would necessarily involve the government locking him up and throwing away the key?
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by chc on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @06:03PM (#6055038)
Because I don't see how it matters. I could believe that he would be easily acquitted in a single day and it would not matter. We're talking about Snowden's decisions here, and Snowden does not listen to me. His read of the situation is the only one that counts, and it is pretty clear that he does not believe he'd have a snowball's chance in hell. You can argue that he's wrong about his chances, but all that would mean is that he's put himself through a lot of hassle and worry for nothing.

Personally, I tend to agree with Snowden — there are too many powerful people who want to destroy him for him to get a fair shake here. You are right that we could be wrong — but I don't see how that matters.

Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by anigbrowl on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @06:10PM (#6055072)
Well, it's certainly up to him to decide for himself, but I think third parties are quite free to form their own opinions about his credibility or integrity (which I rate at something like 6/10, in case you were wondering).
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by chc on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @06:20PM (#6055120)
Yes, certainly! I just think it's irrational to discredit his factual claims on the basis that he is unwilling to stand trial. The truth of the statements "Snowden is telling the truth about our spy programs" and "Snowden is accurately assessing the potential for our justice system to offer him a favorable outcome" are not closely related.
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by anigbrowl on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @08:20PM (#6055525)
I don't see it as a measurement of Snowden's honesty or integrity particularly. It could be that his judgment about the degree and nature of data collection is wrong. I try to avoid making guesses about people's motivations because there's really no way to measure that objectively and it's far too easy to project your own views onto the actions of someone else.
Re:Email exchange between Edward Snowden and former GOP Sena... by foobarqux on Tuesday July 16, 2013 @06:15PM (#6055097)
The charges against Drake were mostly BS (he didn't leak classified information). The infractions by Snowden are clear and the penalties are severe.