Re:When male CEOs have daughters, relative pay for women at ...
by papsosouid on Monday July 15, 2013 @12:29PM
(#6046596)
Yes, that is a baseless assertion. I saw that when it was posted. I even commented on it. About how my wife had the exact same experience in reverse. A single personal anecdote is entirely meaningless.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:When male CEOs have daughters, relative pay for women at ...
by dylandrop on Monday July 15, 2013 @12:34PM
(#6046630)
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/09/14/1211286109
Happy? Besides, you've made quite a baseless assertion when assuming that there exist employers willing to exploit the fact that women are paid 18% less.
Re:When male CEOs have daughters, relative pay for women at ...
by papsosouid on Monday July 15, 2013 @12:37PM
(#6046659)
No. Even if that were real instead of a link to a tabloid I wouldn't be happy, because that isn't relevant. We're not talking about leaders, we're talking about building a company with a massive advantage over the competition by hiring women as workers.