The English Civil War, a few decades earlier, was fought between pro-parliament (Oliver Cromwell) and pro-monarchist forces.
Without these events, it's unlikely the U.S. would have been founded explicitly as a Republic. As it was, Alexander Hamilton and other Federalists argued at the constitutional convention for an elective monarchy. (Which is why the presidency is more powerful than the anti-federalists and others would have liked)
The Magna Carta was also basically ignored, but was utterly critical for the English Bill of Rights, which really has been followed, till this day.
Isn't history fun! And nuanced! And grey!
That caused him great trouble. Till his death, he insisted that be the version preserved for posterity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_In...
How? When the USA got independence it basically copied the UK voting/parliament system, only allowing white men who owned property to voting, just like UK.
Of course, it depends on definition of "democracy". But I can't see how you can have a definition that would hold the following things all true: "(a) The UK is a democracy in 2013 (b) The USA was a democracy in 1776 (c) The UK was not a democracy in 1776 (d) The UK was not a democracy for ~100 years after 1776"
(I use the term UK, but don't think it was called that in 1776)
What about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Lithuanian_Commo... ?
AFAIK, England's parliament, prior to the US, could not remotely be described as a democracy. Indeed, it was well over a hundred years later that this would be the case.
I have no idea what he means by "other parts of Europe". My best guess would be San Marino, which has had a democratic-ish thing going for a very long time. But San Marino was (and indeed is) pretty far from a modern democracy in any sense of the term.
The US might not have a lot of things going for it. But I think it's fair to say that it's the first modern democracy.