News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates? by m_mueller on Friday July 12, 2013 @04:47AM (#6031628)
Isn't the point of client certs that the private key should never leave the machine? I.e. when you want to get access from a Smartphone you just initiate a new certification process, some admin ticks off a new public key and you're set? For consumer faced apps I could see some initial authentication process where for every new public key the user gets an E-Mail in order to activate it. Using it this way I think there is also no reason to use the browser UI for importing / exporting certificates, at least not for the users themselves. Still, the question remains why no-one is using it.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates? by Sami_Lehtinen on Friday July 12, 2013 @07:50AM (#6032095)
This is why: I know one company & service which did. But after a year or two they gave up. It just complicated things, overloaded helpdesk and made customers angry. They used client certificates to count 'workstation licenses' for a web app.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates? by m_mueller on Friday July 12, 2013 @08:39AM (#6032245)
Well, using it for licensing is of course harder to argue for than increasing the user's security. May I ask what were the specific problems in your scenario? I'm guessing users with multiple browsers? That's another reason why I hate Windows not having a central MS provided keyring. If MS had pushed for it soon after the POSIX community and Apple, passwordless authentification might be already a standard nowadays.