Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by count on Thursday July 11, 2013 @12:41PM
(#6027181)
This is an unrelated security measure, but you are correct.
And if you pull the card out, you can't access anything anymore that requires it (and on a Windows domain that DOESNT lock / terminate the session, you'll be able to access things until your kerberos ticket expires or you need to get to something you don't have a ticket for).
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by michaelt on Thursday July 11, 2013 @07:14PM
(#6029905)
I once volunteered at a hospital where they made use of a smart card security system - among other things, it would log you out if you removed your card from the reader. This closed all the programs you were running - and logging back in was a slow process.
Needless to say, the smart cards stayed in the users' PCs even when they weren't at their desks.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by snuxoll on Thursday July 11, 2013 @10:03PM
(#6030457)
That's disappointing, Windows has multiple options to handle a smart card's removal, one of which is simply locking the screen, sad they decided to use the "force log off" setting instead.
Re:Why is nobody using SSL client certificates?
by AjithAntony on Thursday July 11, 2013 @02:52PM
(#6028286)
I think this is a feature of the ActiveClient middleware. Also handles the PIN entry when you insert. Default windows behavior is to leave the certs in the cert store.
Last time I checked DoD systems are configured to automatically log you out of your session upon removal of your CAC.