News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How ASCII lost and unicode won by chiph on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @08:43AM (#6012341)
IIRC, the IBM System 360 is the machine that really set the 8 bits == 1 byte convention in stone.

Before that you had CDC machines with 6-bit bytes (or Nybbles if you owned an Apple ][ with a floppy disk)

Re:How ASCII lost and unicode won by mjn on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @09:11AM (#6012451)
There's some subjectivity in where you consider it standardized, but I would put it later than that. Throughout the period when IBM's System/360 was popular, DEC's PDP series was also popular, which used 36-bit words and a somewhat varying definition of what constituted a byte.

If I had to pick a date, I'd pick 1977 as when it solidified. A few elements: ARPAnet standardized on octet-based protocols in the early 1970s, and was getting widespread by the mid 1970s; three popular microcomputers based on 8-bit architectures were introduced in 1977 (the Apple II, TRS-80, and Commodore PET); and DEC introduced the 32-bit VAX in 1977.

Re:How ASCII lost and unicode won by kalleboo on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @09:48AM (#6012614)
And thanks to good old SMTP originally not being specified as 8-bit, we get freakshows like UTF-7 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-7
Re:How ASCII lost and unicode won by npongratz on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @12:15PM (#6013387)
I knew bytes were ambiguously sized, but I had thought a nibble/nybble was (A) always half an octet, and (B) a fun Apple coders magazine [0].

But sure enough, I was very wrong on (A): Apple II disk writes were done in "sets of 5-bit or, later, 6-bit nibbles" [1].

Thank you, chiph!

[0] http://www.nibblemagazine.com/ [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibble#History

Re:How ASCII lost and unicode won by chiph on Tuesday July 09, 2013 @02:04PM (#6014115)
There's probably some variation in the terminology, but I always used these terms:

    bit
    nibble (4 bits)
    nybble (6 bits)
    byte (8 bits)
    word (16 bits)
    :