Re:Justice Dept. defends secret rulings in new spy court filing
by rayiner on Monday July 08, 2013 @07:23PM
(#6010074)
I think it would be impractical to force every federal agency to put make every legal interpretation public, simply because people wouldn't do it. They'd just avoid putting things down in writing instead. Ultimately, any internal interpretations have to be solidified and put down in writing in any court proceeding. I think that is the backstop against internal interpretations run amok. And it does function as an effective backstop in other areas of government, where every agency action is met by dozens of legal challenges that play out in public courts. The problem with the NSA situation is that the NSA's actions are not subject to regular court challenges, and that's by design. Congress made it that way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Justice Dept. defends secret rulings in new spy court filing
by revelation on Monday July 08, 2013 @07:31PM
(#6010101)
Go back a second here. Of course they are constantly evaluating if they are within the law; so is every other person when filing their goddamn taxes. But legal questions of the magnitude of "do we have the right to collect this data under the constitution" are obviously not decided on the spur of the moment. When the CIA wanted to torture, they asked the DOJ and John Yoo to come up with a piece of paper telling them in lots of legalese that they were allowed to do so.
Obviously these legal interpretations exist, today.