News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alternative Internet by cmpctyd on Monday July 08, 2013 @12:19PM (#6007529)
This is already done in a variety of networks for plausible deniability.

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorFAQ#DoI...

I2P does similar in making every user an internal participant. A network wholly dedicated to pushing redundant/null traffic is not a thing, AFAIK.

Tor, I2P and other networks I'm sure, methods of doing things are more "useful" by providing bandwidth whilst also giving cover traffic.

Re:Alternative Internet by jpdoctor on Monday July 08, 2013 @12:56PM (#6007731)
Sorry, I don't see where they are generating random noise or keywords from your link. The link seems to be discussing the merits of a relay of existing traffic.
Re:Alternative Internet by cmpctyd on Monday July 08, 2013 @01:58PM (#6008087)
Relaying 'existing' traffic is the "random noise". It provides obscure, 'random' traffic between nodes but serves a purpose by providing bandwidth.

The content of this traffic could easily be a useless packet, IRC, HTTP, etc.