News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Memory Comparison of Light Linux Desktops by untrothy on Monday July 08, 2013 @11:59AM (#6007409)
Shame he didn't include xmonad, on my pc it takes about 7/8 MB, but I guess you also have to consider another 4/5 MB for xmobar.
Re:A Memory Comparison of Light Linux Desktops by dons on Monday July 08, 2013 @01:43PM (#6007990)
I don't run xmobar or trayer...

It's nice that we don't need to write these things in C to be small and fast.

Re:A Memory Comparison of Light Linux Desktops by cm3 on Monday July 08, 2013 @03:35PM (#6008725)
Me neither and I can't work without XMonad.Prompt, especially the Shell instance, for spawning executables. I don't remember Tuumo's ion in detail but the only other launcher that behaves similarly in a sane way is cwm's built-in menu. dmenu_run doesn't work the right way and is limited in what it launches or auto completes. Like ion there are also instances for ssh and man pages. When using the shell prompt the memory usage goes up by 1 or 2 megabytes but that's constant. Any time I try spectrwm or dwm I always come back to xmonad.
Re:A Memory Comparison of Light Linux Desktops by lnteveryday on Monday July 08, 2013 @12:28PM (#6007579)
Trayer too (if you use it). I'll have to take a look when I get home to see how it all adds up.
Re:A Memory Comparison of Light Linux Desktops by mercurial on Monday July 08, 2013 @03:34PM (#6008721)
You can try taffybar [1] but it's a bit more involved (I don't think it's packaged anywhere). Has both widgets, task bar and tray.

1: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/taffybar