News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Restore the Fourth by cryptoz on Thursday July 04, 2013 @01:08PM (#5991520)
Obama has been very clear about his love of NSA domestic spying since 2006. He voted numerous times to expand and renew the USA PATRIOT Act. If you didn't want a president with a love of spying on his citizens, you should not have voted for him (if you did) in the primary elections. There were other options, like Dennis Kucinich, who has a proven track record of not voting for the USA PATRIOT Act.

You have a point that it may be difficult to vote for the right people, but it's very easy to make a good start. If a politician campaigns on and promises to increase the amount of creepy spying in your country like Obama did between 2006 and 2008, don't vote for him/her.

Re:Restore the Fourth by cgag on Thursday July 04, 2013 @01:22PM (#5991573)
What if the only two choices are both pro-creepy spying?
Re:Restore the Fourth by cryptoz on Thursday July 04, 2013 @01:26PM (#5991588)
That's why the primary elections are important - by the time we get down to the final two choices, they usually are both in favour of all kinds of evil things. But in the primaries in 2016, we'll probably have 10 choices from each major party, and it's much more likely you'll find someone that matches your views.

It's very important to vote in the primary elections in order to not end up with two evils by the main presidential election. The same logic goes for all other elections, too: your state government, and all levels really. Voting for just one president from two choices is hardly voting at all.

Re:Restore the Fourth by philwelch on Thursday July 04, 2013 @05:33PM (#5992536)
The problem with elections is that however you vote, the majority always wins.