Re:New Argument in Forced-Decryption Case: Defendant’s Memor...
by Figs on Thursday July 04, 2013 @06:29AM
(#5990004)
It's a bit ambiguous what it means to erase an abstract entity like "data". Usually, I would accept it to mean that there are no physical copies of the plain text remaining -- e.g. no copies in terms of bits on a hard disk or strokes of ink on paper. If you've overwritten the sole copy of the original plain text with the ciphertext on a hard disk, then I think it's fair to accept that as erasure of the original data.
Philosophically, of course, all strings of data that will ever be written exist in some abstract mathematical sense -- I can write a program that will eventually generate every single combination of bits that can be ever be stored on a given computer (should you care to wait long enough) including novels that don't exist yet (in the conventional sense that a human author hasn't put pen to paper), and the plaintext that was overwritten by the cryptography program.
Philosophically, of course, all strings of data that will ever be written exist in some abstract mathematical sense -- I can write a program that will eventually generate every single combination of bits that can be ever be stored on a given computer (should you care to wait long enough) including novels that don't exist yet (in the conventional sense that a human author hasn't put pen to paper), and the plaintext that was overwritten by the cryptography program.