News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Verity Stob's guide to upcoming C++0x by ableal on Thursday May 07, 2009 @08:30PM (#598931)
That's a bit depressing, but, hey, look on the bright side: now we may get strong AI out of people trying to generate and parse C++.

Though my bet is still on spam and anti-spam, they have better incentives.

Re:Verity Stob's guide to upcoming C++0x by gchpaco on Thursday May 07, 2009 @09:17PM (#598993)
Every couple of years the part of my brain responsible for making good decisions shuts off and I start looking at what all is required to parse C++, and in particular how you parse it in, say, yacc. As far as I can tell it is done by magic.

With the operator suffix extensions, though, I think C++ has broken new ground again. It is now the only allegedly serious language that requires a symbol table to lex.