News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Verity Stob's guide to upcoming C++0x by jcl on Thursday May 07, 2009 @04:00PM (#598551)
I mean, next year will surely be too late for an '0x' standard? Actually the C-plus-plusers point out it could be delayed until 200A, or indeed until 200F.

Yick. Arc may be a "hundred-year language", but if the C++ committee delays to 200A, that would make C++ a six-thousand-year language (8202 in decimal).

Re:Verity Stob's guide to upcoming C++0x by TallGuyShort on Thursday May 07, 2009 @05:15PM (#598701)
Who cares about it representing a year - C++0x is a cool name all by itself!