News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Harlan, new Lispy language for GPU programming. Parent comment

Re:Harlan, new Lispy language for GPU programming by bajsejohannes on Monday July 01, 2013 @01:19PM (#5972081)
Not exactly sure what you're asking, but GLSL and OpenCL are for two different domains: GLSL for graphics and OpenCL for calculations that are not intended to show up as graphics.

They both run on the same hardware, but I don't have enough (or really any) experience with OpenCL to say if it feels more or less powerful than GLSL.

Edit: It turns out that I have no OpenCL hardware support (mid 2011 MBA), so I guess the hardware isn't necessarily completely similar (i.e. it can support GLSL and not OpenCL)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Harlan, new Lispy language for GPU programming by Impossible on Monday July 01, 2013 @01:55PM (#5972391)
This isn't entirely true. As of OpenGL 4.3 (latest spec), OpenGL adds compute shaders as well. Their primary usage is to make interopt with the graphics pipeline less painful than it would be with OpenCL, but in theory you could use OpenGL (or DX11 on Windows) compute shaders for non-graphics tasks, and they'd have roughly the same capabilities as CUDA or OpenCL.
[ Parent | on HN ]