The .Net Framework is extremely powerful and extensive.
The number of problems the framework has prevented me from needing to solve is staggering. We get work done here, fast.Eg. Recently I had to convert times from any random time zone into another random timezone accounting for daylight savings etc. I cannot imagine having to solve that problem in just about any other language suggested in this comment section.
In my experience you get more built-in with .net, but richer third-party ecosystems elsewhere.
I like C# a little more than Java, but I cant stand assemblies. Jars are much easier to handle.
edit:
Troll? Not.
Like a very simple thing: quick watch in debug blocks the edit window? Really WTF?! I have to move it the second screen to see the actual code. I can name a lot of these small annoyances.
You should try Kepler. Some amazing performance improvements out of the box.
I don't think this means much. It has (poor) support for just about every language under the sun and its free so of course its going to be widely used. It has many features for Java, but features for other languages quickly fall off a cliff. But its the slowness that is a showstopper for me unless I absolutely must go with eclipse. Yes, eventually computer technology will advance to the point where its bloated codebase is no longer a liability, and perhaps we're approaching that. I use the Juno release occasionally for python programming and everything I've mentioned still applies.
Personally I'm not a big fan of plugins in my IDEs: they always feel slow and clunky with a "bolted on" feel. This has been true of every IDE + plugin environment I've tried so far.
If you had said IntelliJ I might have believed it.
He does give some reasons, which might not apply to everyone is another thing: (from the article)
Of all the three I am very agreed with the third one. I wish it would be different but I haven't used a better alternative to VS so far (XCode, Eclipse, Netbeans, etc. just didn't work for me for several reasons )