Why Combinator? Should You Join Paul Graham's Gang For The Gifted?

Re:Why Combinator? Should You Join Paul Graham's Gang For Th... by dshah on Friday March 23, 2007 @03:22PM (#5969)

I must be missing it. To help me understand the error in my ways, can you:

a) identify specifically the part where I attacked?

b) cite where my position on the issue tried to be a statement of fact that was wrong.

Truth is: I do believe (as do many others) that having more than one founder increases of success. PG has gone on record as saying he won't fund startups with just one founder. Neither of these is factually incorrect. I could be wrong to believe it, but the statement of fact that I believe it is true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Combinator? Should You Join Paul Graham's Gang For Th... by volida on Friday March 23, 2007 @03:26PM (#5971)

a)the use of "explicitly": means absolutely--categorically

"there's a problem with finding a co-founder, that's an early signal of a problem (either with the founder or the idea or both),"

b) the fact that YC states they funded single founders is contrary to what you refer to

I never said that is not better to have more people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Combinator? Should You Join Paul Graham's Gang For Th... by dshah on Friday March 23, 2007 @03:33PM (#5973)

Got it. Fair enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]