News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by corr0 on Sunday June 30, 2013 @08:20PM (#5967936)
> "found a correlation of 0.04 – which means that there was effectively no relationship at all."

This is scary:

Independence => 0 correlation

but

~(0 correlation => independence)

Please get your basic statistic straight.

Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011) by simonster on Sunday June 30, 2013 @09:22PM (#5968104)
"effectively no relationship" and "statistically independent" are not necessarily equivalent claims. Assuming Nutt used a rank correlation statistic (Pearson correlation is not well-suited to ordinal data) then zero correlation most likely implies no linear relationship between ranks. That's not equivalent to independence, but I think it's accurate to characterize it as "effectively no relationship" in the context of a discussion about drug laws. OTOH, a scatterplot would be more diagnostic than a statistic here.