No, it's how strongly people object to your dismissal of a couple of great scientists expressing an appreciation of LSD as somehow false, and your assertions that you obviously know better than them.

A dismissal, I might add, with absolutely no argument behind it, simply an arrogant statement.

No, it wouldn't bother people so much if you made an argument instead of handing out judgement. You come across as extremely arrogant and you don't make arguments, you make statements.

It's not reserved for trolls. There's also room there for people who complain about being downvoted.

By pandering, do you mean actually form an argument instead of expecting people to accepted the Truth you've revealed?

The difference is that simonster actually presented facts, while your post was just "nu-uh".