[deleted]
No, it's how strongly people object to your dismissal of a couple of great scientists expressing an appreciation of LSD as somehow false, and your assertions that you obviously know better than them.
A dismissal, I might add, with absolutely no argument behind it, simply an arrogant statement.
[deleted]
No, it wouldn't bother people so much if you made an argument instead of handing out judgement. You come across as extremely arrogant and you don't make arguments, you make statements.
It's not reserved for trolls. There's also room there for people who complain about being downvoted.
[deleted]
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011)
by icebraining on Sunday June 30, 2013 @07:34PM
(#5967782)
By pandering, do you mean actually form an argument instead of expecting people to accepted the Truth you've revealed?
Re:Drugs and the Meaning of Life (2011)
by icebraining on Sunday June 30, 2013 @07:01PM
(#5967644)
The difference is that simonster actually presented facts, while your post was just "nu-uh".
OTOH, Kary Mullis explicitly attributes PCR to his LSD use. I'd ordinarily believe the primary source over uninformed speculation, but Mullis is also an AIDS and climate change denialist who claims he once spoke to a glowing green raccoon, so he is probably not the most reliable source either.