News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Defense Department Blocks Access to Guardian to Prevent V... by throwaway10001 on Friday June 28, 2013 @08:23AM (#5957544)
When you join the Army etc you largely leave your free speech (and many other) rights at the door, so I fail to see the equivalence.

My guess is that that info is still classified, even though it's public, and accessing it might be a technical violation for those without clearances.

Re:Defense Department Blocks Access to Guardian to Prevent V... by rhizome on Friday June 28, 2013 @12:20PM (#5958795)
For the first part, I didn't say they were equivalent. I said it was the same criteria by which China and Snowden were criticized, not that the US was doing to all of its citizens all of the things that the US criticizes China for.

For the second, honest question: does published information actually retain its classification?

Re:Defense Department Blocks Access to Guardian to Prevent V... by zimbatm on Sunday June 30, 2013 @05:51AM (#5965258)
> My guess is that that info is still classified, even though it's public, and accessing it might be a technical violation for those without clearances.

What prevents people to use their 3G network to fetch up the article ? Public is public, it's too late for clearance.