News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by gliaskos on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @01:59PM (#5947724)
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by j_s on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @03:39PM (#5948479)
Nice! In practice that just meant I always switched to x86.

'Managed return value inspection' is a nice enhancement too.

Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by Gmo on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @02:18PM (#5947883)
Ha thanks, this was really frustrating indeed.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by snarfy on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @03:29PM (#5948397)
I was wondering why I would want to upgrade from 2012 because windows 8.1 isn't it. Now I know.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by lostoptimist on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @03:33PM (#5948436)
Does this imply there will be a 64 bit VS? Or will it just take place entirely in an emulator?
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by j_s on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @03:41PM (#5948495)
x64 is one of the 'build platforms' for .NET projects in Visual Studio:

   With Visual Studio 2013 Preview, you can now use [Edit and Continue] with x64, 
   AnyCPU, and (of course) x86 projects.
See also: http://visualstudiohacks.com/articles/visual-studio-net-plat...
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by br1 on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @04:05PM (#5948636)
lostoptimist surely meant running visual studio itself as a 64 bit process to use more than 4 gb of ram