Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps
by hemancuso on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @01:28PM
(#5947515)
Am I the only one who thinks they should call it VS 2014? By time it ships it'll only have a few months before it has an outdated title.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It seems to me that there will be yearly releases to coincide with the yearly release of Windows so there will likely be a separate VS2014.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps
by ScottWhigham on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @02:04PM
(#5947769)
I don't get it either. There was already a VS2012, and changing to VS2013 for a few months seems like a decision driven by some weird force. Waiting to release for another 3 months would not have killed anyone.
They usually +1 the version every time there is a base windows release which is what Windows 8.1 actually is.
I'm not complaining as I get it on MSDN under my subscription.
How about going back to version numbers so it doesn't matter what year it came out like everyone else?