News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by hemancuso on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @01:28PM (#5947515)
Am I the only one who thinks they should call it VS 2014? By time it ships it'll only have a few months before it has an outdated title.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by Moto7451 on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @01:36PM (#5947552)
It seems to me that there will be yearly releases to coincide with the yearly release of Windows so there will likely be a separate VS2014.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by ScottWhigham on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @02:04PM (#5947769)
I don't get it either. There was already a VS2012, and changing to VS2013 for a few months seems like a decision driven by some weird force. Waiting to release for another 3 months would not have killed anyone.
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by kryten on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @02:30PM (#5948005)
They usually +1 the version every time there is a base windows release which is what Windows 8.1 actually is.

I'm not complaining as I get it on MSDN under my subscription.

Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by SigmundA on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @03:31PM (#5948422)
How about going back to version numbers so it doesn't matter what year it came out like everyone else?
Re:Visual Studio 2013, ALM, and DevOps by pestaa on Wednesday June 26, 2013 @01:35PM (#5947550)
You should be happy they'll ship another one within 12 months! /sarcasm