News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OS X is holding back the 2013 MacBook Air’s 802.11ac Wi-F... by trotsky on Monday June 24, 2013 @05:48PM (#5935928)
Why would you test wifi speed using afp or cifs? Don't both those protocols dictate a fsync on each block, meaning they are very dependent on rtt which is much longer via radio? If you're testing radio bandwidth you really want to use a protocol without restraints like that, such as rtsp or http. While window size will undoubtedly help here, I wouldn't be surprised to find that windows 8 isn't flushing as often or performs async fsyncs.
Re:OS X is holding back the 2013 MacBook Air’s 802.11ac Wi-F... by drewcrawford on Monday June 24, 2013 @06:10PM (#5936076)
Probably because afp or cifs are going to be the situation that ordinary people experience a WLAN bottleneck?

The speed of RTSP over 802.11ac would be relevant if you are giving a keynote address in your living room that needs to be streamed to the hundreds of interested participants in the kitchen.

Re:OS X is holding back the 2013 MacBook Air’s 802.11ac Wi-F... by trotsky on Monday June 24, 2013 @06:26PM (#5936156)
yet they test 10ft los in a barren band, making it clear that they're trying to conduct an unrealistic lab style rf/phy interface test.